Home \ Newsroom \ Court Decision on CFPB Limited But Still Damaging to American Consumers Who Need Protection From Financial Rip-Offs

Court Decision on CFPB Limited But Still Damaging to American Consumers Who Need Protection From Financial Rip-Offs

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, October 11, 2016
Contact: Nick Jacobs, 202-618-6430, njacobs@bettermarkets.com

 

Washington, D.C. – Dennis Kelleher, President and CEO of Better Markets, issued the following statement on the decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruling against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 

"The Court decision today on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was very narrow, but it was not wise.  The limited ruling merely expanded the President’s power to remove the head of the CFPB for any reason, not just for cause as passed in the Dodd-Frank law, as is the case with other executive agencies. 

"When drafting the law, Congress and President Obama knew that the CFPB would be a priority target for the financial industry to kill because it would be a powerful consumer watchdog.  That is why the law carefully struck a balance between protecting the consumer bureau from politics and the industry’s political allies while insuring it was accountable and had effective oversight.  That is also why, in addition to transparency, oversight and accountability, it is an independent executive bureau with independent funding and a leader that can only be removed for cause, until the court decision.

"The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is one of the most necessary and successful agencies ever created.  In just a few years since it was created, it has returned more than $11 billion to more than 27 million Americans ripped off by financial firms.  After more than a decade of being victimized by financial predators, that is great news for America’s financial consumers.  Finally, there is an effective cop on the Wall Street beat, but that’s also why financial firms hate the agency and have fought relentlessly to kill it.  This misguided and needless decision will only embolden those critics who will not be satisfied until the agency is killed or crippled." 

###

Article Keywords:

Share This Article: